<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>University of Canterbury Wine Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com</link>
	<description>wine tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pinot Noir 21st May 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/pinot-noir-21st-may-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/pinot-noir-21st-may-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 08:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/pinot-noir-21st-may-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ Rieslings 30th April 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/nz-rieslings</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/nz-rieslings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 08:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Zealand Riesling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/New-Zealand-Riesling.ppt'>New Zealand Riesling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/nz-rieslings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern Rhone 16th April 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/southern-rhone-16th-april-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/southern-rhone-16th-april-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern Rhone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/souhern-rhone-16-4-09.odp">Southern Rhone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/southern-rhone-16th-april-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Wines 101 19th March  2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/red-wines-101</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/red-wines-101#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Wines 101 Anthony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/red-wines-101_anthony.pptx">Red Wines 101 Anthony</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/red-wines-101/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canterbury Reds Tasting 2nd of October 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/canterbury-reds-tasting-2nd-of-october-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/canterbury-reds-tasting-2nd-of-october-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday 2nd of October 2009 the Canterbury Wine Club explored the various offerings of red wine available from the Canterbury Region. Please find the pdf of the presentation from the tasting bleow. Canterbury Reds 2-10-09]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday 2nd of October 2009 the Canterbury Wine Club explored the various offerings of red wine available from the Canterbury Region.</p>
<p>Please find the pdf of the presentation from the tasting bleow.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/canterbury-reds.pdf">Canterbury Reds 2-10-09</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/canterbury-reds-tasting-2nd-of-october-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand Chardonay Tasting 11th of September 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/new-zealand-chardonay-tasting</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/new-zealand-chardonay-tasting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chardonnay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday 9th of September 2009 the Canterbury University Wine Club enjoyed some very tasty New Zealand Chardonays! Please find the pdf of the presentation from the Chardonay Tasting linked below. New Zealand Chardonay Tasting 11th September 2009 Powerpoint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday 9th of September 2009 the Canterbury University Wine Club enjoyed some very tasty New Zealand Chardonays!</p>
<p>Please find the pdf of the presentation from the Chardonay Tasting linked below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/chardonnay-tasting-110909-c.pdf">New Zealand Chardonay Tasting 11th September 2009</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucwineclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/chardonnay-tasting-110909.ppt">Powerpoint</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/new-zealand-chardonay-tasting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sum vs. The Components</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/the-sum-vs-the-components</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/the-sum-vs-the-components#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cabernet Franc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabernet Sauvignon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merlot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petit Verdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday 26 June 2008 Thanks to the team at Te Mata Estate we were able to run our &#8220;The Sum vs. The Components&#8221; tasting again this year. With pure varietals from the 2008 vintage that will be the components of the Te Mata Bordeaux blends we had a unique opportunity to look at how a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Thursday 26 June 2008</h4>
<p>Thanks to the team at Te Mata Estate we were able to run our &#8220;The Sum vs. The Components&#8221; tasting again this year. With pure varietals from the 2008 vintage that will be the components of the Te Mata Bordeaux blends we had a unique opportunity to look at how a wine maker can produce a Sum that is more than its Component parts. As well we tried some of the past blends from Te Mata to see what they have aimed for in blending.</p>
<h2>The Components:</h2>
<h3>Cabernet Sauvignon 2008 (from Havelock North vineyards)</h3>
<p>This was the stand out wine among the component varieties. There was a most attractive cassis and cedar/oak nose which was intense and perfectly matched to the brilliant, intense purple/red colour. It was a classic example of young Cabernet Sauvignon aroma. The palate was all ripe fruit with plenty of tannin and acid combined with great power. In such a young wine (the components are still months away from being combined in a blend) there are rough edges and a bit of harshness but this component suggests Cabernet Sauvignon is going to be a good proportion of the blend in Te Mata&#8217;s top 2008 wines.</p>
<h3>Merlot 2008 (from Havelock North vineyards)</h3>
<p>The Merlot was just as expected, a softer fruitier nose with the traditional pluminess of Merlot. Again the colour was an intense purple/red. On the palate it has nice tannin, ripe fruit and plenty of acid but without the power of the Cabernet Sauvignon. This was the component that had a touch of mineral character described by some as like Irish Moss. I thought that it had just a touch of volatility. As a component it was obvious that this could be used to soften out the Cabernet Sauvignon.</p>
<h3>Cabernet Franc 2008 (from Havelock North vineyards)</h3>
<p>This was again a softer wine with limited tannin and a juicy character. It did not have the vibrant character of the Cabernet Sauvignon and it had the least appealing nose of the four components. The palate showed nice ripe fruit and good intensity. This was clearly another option for softening the Cabernet Sauvignon.</p>
<h3>Petit Verdot 2008 (Woodthorpe vineyard)</h3>
<p>True to its reputation the Petit Verdot was an intense purple/black colour and it had a very fragrant nose that was a surprise to me. This was a really attractive wine with peppery and spicy characters that suggested it could add some complexity to the blend. I thought that this was a fine example of Petit Verdot.</p>
<h2>The Blends:</h2>
<h3>Te Mata Woodthorpe Merlot/Cabernet Sauvignon 2005</h3>
<p>Blended from: Merlot 57%, Cabernet Sauvignon 18%, Cabernet Franc 16%, Petit Verdot 9%.</p>
<p>This is Te Mata&#8217;s third level Bordeaux blend and their largest selling wine. It has an attractive nose with some cassis and soft oak combined with the dominant plummy character. The palate was soft and approachable but had nice fruit and moderate length. At three years old it is probably just about at its best as this is clearly aimed at early drinking. This is a clear example of the winemaker aiming for an approachable blend that does not need to be cellared to show its best.</p>
<h3>Te Mata Awatea 2002</h3>
<p>This wine caused a major split in our members. For quite a few it was the best wine of the evening with the aged characters showing on both the nose and palate. I was in the second group who thought that it had not kept. (A quick try of the two bottles we used did not show much difference between them.) For me it had developed an off-character that swamped the fruit and tannin both on the palate and on the nose.</p>
<h3>Te Mata Awatea 2006</h3>
<p>Blended from 36% Cabernet Sauvignon, 15% Cabernet Franc, 38% Merlot and 11% Petit Verdot</p>
<p>This was every thing that would be expected of a top quality Hawke&#8217;s Bay Bordeaux blend. There was a lovely cassis nose with balanced cedar wood and still a beautiful youthful purple. This nose was just starting to show the change from fresh fruity young aromas to the more developed bouquet of dried fruit and cigar box. It is a nicely balanced wine but with plenty of restrained power and the potential to age well. It was quite obvious that this wine is intended to improve with age and that we were drinking it before its best.</p>
<h2>Blending</h2>
<p>So what of our attempts at blending? Not surprisingly they tended to fall into two groups, some based on Cabernet Sauvignon that were austere styles needing time to soften out and some based on Merlot that were much softer and immediately attractive. My observations based on personal efforts and those around me were:</p>
<p>Softening out the Cabernet Sauvignon with mainly Merlot was more successful than with more Cabernet Franc. The latter flattened out the lovely nose of the Cabernet Sauvignon too much. A decent measure of Petit Verdot gave some added characters and helped to maintain the lovely nose. For an ageing style then perhaps 50-60% C.S. with about 25% Merlot and rather more P.V. than C.F. seemed close to the money for me. For a softer early maturing style reversing the proportions of Merlot and C.S. seemed the way that most went.</p>
<p>A great fun evening doing something quite different to our regular tasting evenings and thanks to Te Mata Estate for providing the wines at some considerable effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/the-sum-vs-the-components/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chablis and Chardonnay tasting</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/chablis-and-chardonnays-tasting</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/chablis-and-chardonnays-tasting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chablis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chardonnay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6 June 2008 St. Pierre Chablis 2001, AOC Chablis  $34 Nice clean chardonnay nose with some developed colour. The palate had malic acid (apple), a touch of wood and good length. The wine was typically French with a complex structured style and no overt fruitiness. A very typical lean Chablis style which was just starting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>6 June 2008</h4>
<h3>St.   Pierre Chablis 2001, AOC Chablis  $34</h3>
<p>Nice clean chardonnay nose with some developed colour. The palate had malic acid (apple), a touch of wood and good length. The wine was typically French with a complex structured style and no overt fruitiness. A very typical lean Chablis style which was just starting to show its age with a slight hint of oxidation. <strong>3 votes</strong></p>
<h3>Jean Marc Brocard Beauregard Chablis Premier Cru 2003, AOC Chablis Premier Cru, $30.15</h3>
<p>This wine had quite a developed colour for the age. The fruit was lovely and ripe with some wood and a citrus character. This was a bigger wine than the St.   Pierre and had a nice long finish. Like the St. Pierre this wine showed the typical restrained style expected of Chablis. This was a quality wine with plenty of life ahead of it. <strong>7 votes</strong></p>
<h3>Sacred Hill Barrel Ferment Chardonnay 2002, Hawkes Bay, $25</h3>
<p>Obviously ripe and overt fruit was the first impression of this wine, especially after the restrained style of the two Chablis. There was obvious oak on the nose but overall it was quite well-balanced with integrated characters. However there was no elegance or style and it was already showing aged characters. <strong>3 votes</strong></p>
<h3>Mills Reef Reserve Chardonnay 2006, Hawkes Bay $18.99</h3>
<p>For its age this wine was surprisingly developed in colour but the nose still showed the aromas of a young wine. On the palate it still needs time to develop with the components obvious individually. This was a wine with considerably more character and good value for the money. <strong>5 votes</strong></p>
<h3>Craggy Range Gimblett Gravels Chardonnay 2007, Hawkes Bay, $26.99</h3>
<p>This young wine was pale gold with a nose dominated by oak and ripe fruit. The fruit, acid and tannin balance was good but this was a wine that showed the hot character of high alcohol. This was a very typical New World chardonnay style but it lacked the class of the Mills Reef.</p>
<h3>Clearview Beachhead Chardonnay 2007, Hawkes Bay, $21.99</h3>
<p>The Beachhead wine is from Te Awanga on the coast where it is cooler than the inland areas of Hawke&#8217;s Bay. The colour of the wine is a pale gold/green and the nose has a distinct acid lift. There is only a touch of oak on the palate and the length is moderate. This is a somewhat featureless wine that is a bit of a guide to why the aromatic varieties have become so much more popular in the moderate price bracket.</p>
<h3>Kim Crawford Briant Vineyard Chardonnay 2007, Gisborne, $16.99</h3>
<p>From the warmer Gisborne region this chardonnay displayed the typical tropical fruit characters. The wine was made to drink immediately with a touch of oak but no complexity. This was a distinctly different style to the Hawke&#8217;s Bay wines but again was simple and lacking in character. <strong>2 votes</strong></p>
<h3><strong>Spy</strong><strong> Valley</strong><strong> Chardonnay 2006, Marlborough, $18.99</strong></h3>
<p>This Marlborough wine was another distinct change from the Hawke&#8217;s Bay wines and somewhat closer to the Chablis. There is quite a golden colour and the nose is more complex with a touch of oak and nicely lifted acid. On the palate it is refreshing, showing nice ripe fruit that is not so overt, a mineral character and a backbone of complexity leading to a long finish. Of all the NZ wines this showed the most potential to age well. This was the style that appealed most to me. <strong>3 Votes</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/chablis-and-chardonnays-tasting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merlot tasting</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/merlot</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/merlot#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chablis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gewürztraminer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merlot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[16 May 2008 Clearview Cape Kidnappers Merlot 2006, $19.72 Merlot with Malbec &#8211; we can assume less than 15% Malbec as it is not mentioned on the label 2006 was a very good vintage in Hawke&#8217;s Bay and this was a nice example of a Merlot made in a early drinking style. It had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>16 May 2008</h4>
<h3><strong><span lang="EN-NZ">Clearview</span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-NZ"> Cape</span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-NZ"> Kidnappers Merlot 2006, $19.72</span></strong></h3>
<p>Merlot with Malbec &#8211; we can assume less than 15% Malbec as it is not mentioned on the label</p>
<p>2006 was a very good vintage in Hawke&#8217;s Bay and this was a nice example of a Merlot made in a early drinking style. It had a deep purple hue, with plenty of good ripe fruit on the nose. It was a bit more austere and chewy than expected for this style but had good length and just a touch of oak and complexity. Despite the early drinking style might be better in a year or two. Maybe the slightly cooler Te Awanga area contributed this character.</p>
<h3>Esk Valley Black Label Merlot 2006, $19.97</h3>
<p>100% Merlot</p>
<p>The Esk Valley was made from Gimblett Gravels fruit. Even deeper purple in colour, it had the appearance of a very young wine with aromas of plum and even floral. The palate was much more rounded with the classic Merlot velvety mouth feel and a touch of mineral. This wine also had good length but was more attractive as a drink now proposition, two of our members rating it best of the night on this score.</p>
<h3>Red Rock Gravel Pit Red 2006, $17.99</h3>
<p>&#8220;Mostly Merlot with a seasoning of Malbec&#8221; &#8211; could mean anything (no varietal labelling) but count on reputable producer to mean what they say</p>
<p>From the Gimblett Gravels this wine also had a deep intense purple colour but the nose had quite a bit of oak (courtesy of a bit of new oak?) to go with the fruit aromas. This was a more complex wine with plenty of power and length on the palate to complement the ripe fruit and nice acid. The wine had the smooth mouth filling character expected of a Merlot. This was equal first as the best to drink now.</p>
<h3>CJ Pask Roy&#8217;s Hill Merlot 2006, $15</h3>
<p>100% Merlot</p>
<p>This wine is from the Gimblett Gravels where Pask was the first winery to plant grapes. The colour was a rather less intense purple/ruby. The nose was powerful and had some developed wood and dried fruit bouquet characters as opposed to the youthful aromas of the first three. The Plumy and mouth filling palate made this an easy drinking style and was best to drink now by two members.</p>
<h3>Mission Estate Reserve Merlot 2005, $19.99 on special</h3>
<p>87% Merlot, 7% Malbec, 5% Cabernet Franc, 1% Cabernet Sauvignon</p>
<p>This was produced from fruit sourced in Te Awanga, Gimblett Gravels and Dartmoor. The colour was deep purple/black and the nose had great depth of fruit with nice oak in a somewhat developed style. It is still a very young wine with weight on the palate that is rounded and balanced, finishing with good length. This wine was quite clearly produced in a slower developing style, with 50% new oak, and a deliberate attempt to build complexity.</p>
<h3>CJ Pask Declaration Merlot 2004, $48</h3>
<p>100% Merlot</p>
<p>Produced from Gimblett Gravels grapes and blended from fruit grown on the best clay rich sites in the Pask vineyard. It had a very intense deep purple colour. There was lovely &#8220;cedar box&#8221; oak and a bouquet of dried fruit on the nose. On the palate it was notable for its power combined with velvety rounded fruit and good length. Despite being four year old the wine still has a few years to integrate fully and show its best. Gold medal standard. This wine scored the second most votes for wine of the night and was also equal first as best to drink now.</p>
<h3>Craggy Range Sophia 2004, $49.90</h3>
<p>92% Merlot, 7% Cabernet Franc, 1% Cabernet Sauvignon</p>
<p>Produced from Gimblett Gravels fruit. The colour was very intense purple. The nose was still very much toward the young berry fruit aromas but with great intensity and balanced oak. Even more so than the Pask this wine was notable for its power but it has all the balance between ripe fruit, tannin and acid to suggest development into a complex and elegant aged wine. This was starting to integrate but is still not ready to drink and it just piped the Declaration for wine of the night. Gold medal standard</p>
<h3>Mills Reef Elspeth Merlot 2005, $33.99 on special ($44 regular)</h3>
<p>100% Merlot</p>
<p>This was produced from much younger Gimglett Gravel vines, (6-7 years). Again the wine was a deep purple but the nose was quite different. There was an obvious mineral/iodine character that seems more characteristic of Syrah wine but this came with lovely fruit and oak. On the palate it was mouth filling, complex, quite aggressive and full of nice ripe fruit. This wine was perhaps the most complex style of the night and it was third &#8220;favourite&#8221; for wine of the night. Gold medal standard.</p>
<p>This was an interesting evening which demonstrated the wide range of styles that can be produced from one variety even when they are produced in the same region. We could not look for a better example of why saying &#8220;I love (or hate) Merlot&#8221; is so pointless. As with all other wine varieties it is individual wines or styles which appeal to us, not whole classes of wines from some particular variety.</p>
<p>For me it also demonstrated that Hawke&#8217;s Bay produces great Merlots that show just how classical this variety is. Fortunately for us consumers however they are desperately unfashionable and therefore tremendous value for money. According to Vino Fino Hawke&#8217;s Bay reds and Merlot in particular are almost unsaleable in Christchurch!! More fool Christchurch I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/merlot/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White Wines 101</title>
		<link>http://www.ucwineclub.com/white-wines-101</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucwineclub.com/white-wines-101#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chardonnay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gewürztraminer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinot Gris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riesling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sauvignon Blanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viognier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucwineclub.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7 March 2008 We had a great crowd of sixty members at our first tasting of the year. Mita had a lovely line up of wines of which the last two were served blind to see just how well we had concentrated on the various styles. All in all a great introduction to the main [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>7 March 2008</h4>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal   0         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><span class="mceItemObject"   classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></span></p>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<p><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]></p>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<p><![endif]--></p>
<p>We had a great crowd of sixty members at our first tasting of the year. Mita had a lovely line up of wines of which the last two were served blind to see just how well we had concentrated on the various styles. All in all a great introduction to the main white varieties grown in New Zealand.</p>
<h3><strong>Vidal Marlborough Riesling 2006, $14.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>Although this wine was two years old it showed very little development of ageing character. It had a bright lemon green colour and a very citric nose. The palate showed good ripe fruit and lovely acid. This was an elegant vibrant wine which will develop very well over a few years.</p>
<h3><strong>Stoneleigh Marlborough Chardonnay 2007, $15.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>The colour was pale gold and the nose showed obvious oak balanced with good chardonnay character. Some stone fruit character on the nose and the palate was lively with powerful ripe fruit, light oak and a long finish. This was a very young wine showing al the characteristics of a wine that will age well over several years.</p>
<h3><strong>Waipara Hills Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc 2007, $13.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>This wine was a classic example of Marlborough sauvignon blanc, the signature wine style of New Zealand. Very pale but with a powerful nose of gooseberry and cut grass. Showed the vivacity that makes this style of wine so popular.</p>
<h3><strong>Mills Reef Gewürztraminer 2006, $16.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>Lots of spicy gewürztraminer character and starting to show a bit of development. Made with a little residual sugar (10gms/litre) to fill out the palate this style of wine needs some time to integrate and show its style. This had the rose-water or lychee characters with the &#8220;hard&#8221; and long finish that is the hallmark of gewürztraminer made with good ripe fruit. Very good wine at such a bargain price. Also capable of ageing for some years yet.</p>
<h3><strong>Montana Reserve Pinot Gris 2007, $12.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>This was a particular bargain with a normal retail of over $21, and it showed. Powerful ripe fruit on the nose and on the palate was beautifully balanced by just a touch of residual sugar and nice acid. It was of course still very young, but despite obvious care in winemaking demonstrated by the &#8220;oily&#8221; texture, this is one for early drinking. For me it was a pleasure to have a New Zealand Pinot Gris that was not made with too much residual sugar.</p>
<h3><strong>Morton Estate White Label Viognier 2006, $17.90</strong></h3>
<p>Hawke&#8217;s Bay seems to be the best spot in New Zealand for this increasingly popular variety. This wine, unlike so many, was pretty much true to the winemaker&#8217;s notes. A number of members commented on the citrus character and it definitely had an unctuous feel in the mouth. The wine had a nice long finish with plenty of intensity of fruit.</p>
<h3><strong>Wairau</strong><strong> River Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc 2007, $13.99</strong></h3>
<p>Judging by the fact that nearly all of us picked this wine correctly when it was served blind it must have been a very typical sauvignon blanc. I certainly though it was with very much of the same lively acidity and gooseberry character. It did not have quite the same depth of fruit as the Waipara Hills wine but a nice drop nonetheless.</p>
<h3><strong>Montana Reserve Marlborough Chardonnay 2005, $12.99 on special</strong></h3>
<p>This was another great Woollies bargain for a classical Marlborough Chardonnay. With three years ageing this wine was showing some developed colour and complexity. Compared to the Stoneleigh wine this had been made to exhibit more complexity and less obvious fruit. Together with the extra age this showed up in the blind tasting where we were nowhere near as unanimous in picking it as a Chardonnay. I think this was the pick of the wines for the night but with a range of styles just about all the wines had some supporters for best wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucwineclub.com/white-wines-101/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
